Using Git rebase without creating chaos in your repo

Git rebase can be a powerful tool for maintaining a clean and linear project history, but it can also introduce complexities and potential issues if not used carefully. In this guide, we'll explore best practices for using git rebase, common pitfalls to avoid, and tips for managing conflicts effectively.

The Benefits and Risks of Git Rebase

Rebasing is often used to streamline a series of commits into a single, cohesive narrative. This can make your project's history much easier to follow. However, rebasing can also change commit hashes, which can be problematic for team members who have already pulled those commits.

Advantages of Rebasing:

Clean History: Combines multiple commits into one, making the project history easier to read.
Linear Timeline: Ensures that the commit history is linear, which can be beneficial for project management.

Disadvantages of Rebasing:

Change of Commit Hashes: This can create headaches for collaborators, as they might need to reset their local branches.
Complexity in Conflict Resolution: Rebasing a branch with many conflicts can be challenging and time-consuming.

When to Use Merge Instead of Rebase

In cases where there are many commits and conflicts, merging might be a safer and easier option. While merging adds a new commit to your history, it preserves the commit hashes and can avoid the confusion that comes with rebasing.

# Use merge when dealing with complex conflict scenarios
git checkout main
git merge feature-branch

Handling Issues During Rebase

Abort the Rebase

If something goes wrong during a rebase, it is often best to abort and start over. This can help avoid introducing further issues.

# Abort the rebase
git rebase --abort

Automate Conflict Resolution

If you find yourself fixing the same conflicts repeatedly, use git rerere to automate the resolution process.

# Enable rerere
git config --global rerere.enabled true

Undo a Rebase Gone Wrong

If a rebase has gone south, use git reflog to undo the changes.

Example:

View the reflog to find the previous state:

git reflog

You might see something like this:

a1b2c3d (HEAD -> feature-branch) HEAD@{0}: rebase finished: returning to refs/heads/feature-branch
e4f5g6h HEAD@{1}: rebase: squash commit
i7j8k9l HEAD@{2}: checkout: moving from main to feature-branch

Reset to a previous state:
```
git reset --hard HEAD@{2}
```

Best Practices for Rebasing

Stick to Your Workflow

Don’t change the git strategy chosen by your organization, suddenly. If your team prefers a “squash and merge” workflow, it is best to stick with it and avoid switching to rebase.

Be Cautious with Long-Lived Branches

Rebasing long-lived branches can be particularly difficult due to the number of changes that have occurred. Consider whether rebasing is the best option in these scenarios.

Understand the Implications

When you rebase, you become a co-author on the commit, and GPG signatures might be lost. Make sure you understand these implications before proceeding.

Use `-force-with-lease`

When pushing after a rebase, use --force-with-lease to ensure that no one else has pushed changes to the branch since your last fetch. This command will only force push if the remote branch has not been updated since the last fetch, preventing you from overwriting others' changes.

By following these guidelines, you can leverage the power of git rebase while minimizing the risks and complications that can arise.

Online